Start with one workflow. Scale when it proves useful.
Four tiers match four stages of adoption. We quote the actual environment, capacity and assurance you need rather than publishing a number that quietly excludes them.
Three things appear on the commercial picture.
The plan follows the number of teams, workflows, integrations and governance requirements in scope.
AI-provider consumption remains visible by team and project. Use your provider account where supported or let us consolidate the bill.
Use your own engineering environment or add managed capacity when you want NovaCore to operate it.
Human collaboration is not the meter. Occasional requesters and approvers should not become a seat-planning exercise. The commercial drivers are governed scope, concurrent capacity, managed infrastructure and assurance.
A clear tier for each stage.
Prove one valuable workflow against your repositories, rules and review process.
- ·One focused engineering workflow
- ·Guided Jira, GitHub and environment setup
- ·A defined evaluation window and success measures
- ·Usage, quality and reviewer-effort report
- ·A clear path to Team or a clean stop
A product team assigning Nova work as part of its normal backlog.
- ·Unlimited human requesters, reviewers and approvers
- ·Visible work history and verification
- ·Jira, GitHub and NovaCore
- ·Configurable rules and approval modes
- ·Tenant-owned environment support
- ·Standard support and usage reporting
Multiple teams that need shared governance, capacity and operational visibility.
- ·Everything in Team
- ·Multiple projects and rule sets
- ·Managed engineering environments
- ·Central usage, approval and evidence views
- ·Priority support and rollout planning
- ·Higher concurrent work capacity
Organisations with dedicated deployment, security and assurance requirements.
- ·Everything in Business
- ·Dedicated deployment options
- ·Private networking and custom retention
- ·Security review and tailored controls
- ·Service commitments and named escalation
- ·Volume and capacity planning
What changes the quote: number of teams, concurrent work, managed versus tenant-owned environments, deployment model, retention, support and security obligations.
What remains visible: AI-provider and managed-environment consumption. Those costs are measured separately so you can see what each team and project used.
- No approval-seat tax
People who request, review or approve work are included rather than rationed.
- Usage is not hidden
AI-provider and managed-environment consumption remain attributable by team and project.
- Pilot has a decision
The evaluation starts with success measures and ends with evidence to expand or stop.
Tell us the first workflow and operating requirements.
One team, a representative repository, approval requirements and your preferred deployment model are enough for us to recommend a tier and explain the quote.