Give it a ticket. Get back a pull request.
Not a chat window. Real work, assigned the way you assign work to anyone else, that comes back finished and ready to review.
What you can hand it today.
Fix the bug
A ticket with a clear reproduction becomes a pull request with a test that proves it is fixed.
Do the upgrade
Framework and dependency bumps, with the test suite as the safety net and the breakages fixed.
Clear the warnings
Deprecations and compiler notices across a whole codebase — the work that is easy and endless.
Review the change
A reviewer on every pull request that has actually read the codebase, not just the diff.
Investigate the alert
The ones that fire, get acknowledged, and never get looked at. It writes up what it found.
Cover the gap
Tests for a module nobody has touched in a year, before somebody has to touch it.
The pattern that works is not the most impressive task. It is work that genuinely needs doing, that someone would otherwise do, where a mistake costs you a rejected pull request rather than an incident.
It works like a colleague, not a chat window.
It keeps going
Work spans hours or days. It does not lose the thread because a session ended or a model changed underneath it.
It asks when unsure
Rather than guessing and producing something confidently wrong. Questions land in the ticket, where the rest of your team can see them.
It waits for free
Sitting waiting for your answer costs nothing. Nobody is quietly paying for it to sit idle.
It picks itself back up
If a machine restarts halfway through, it carries on from where it was rather than starting again or doing something twice.
- Mon 09:00 Picked up ticket #2841 duplicate confirmation emails started
- Mon 09:05 Reproduced the bug and wrote a test for it working
- Mon 09:40 Asked a question in the ticket and waited two hours waiting
- Mon 11:38 Fixed it — 214 tests pass 3 files changed done
- Mon 11:39 Opened a pull request for review waiting
- Mon 14:02 You approved it approved
- Mon 14:32 Shipped, then watched for 30 minutes no errors verified
It uses what your team already uses.
Tickets come from GitHub, Jira or Linear. Pull requests appear in your repository and get reviewed the way every other pull request does. Questions and approvals reach you in Slack, Teams or email.
Nobody has to learn a new place to work. Your team sees the output, not the machinery.
The AI underneath is your choice too — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, on your own accounts. When a better one comes along, and one will, you change it in settings rather than rebuilding around it.
- Everything it did
Every command, every file it touched, every decision — watchable live or read back later.
- What it cost
Per ticket, per team, per repository. No surprises at the end of the month.
- How often it was right
How much your reviewers had to correct, tracked over time so you can see it improving or not.
- What it knows
It learns your codebase as it goes, and shows you where each thing it believes came from. You can correct it.
Control, and where it runs.
Staying in control
Nothing reaches production without you. You set how far it can go, per team and per repository, and you can undo anything it did.
How approvals work →Runs on your infrastructure
It works on machines you own, inside your network. Your code never leaves, and we never need access to your systems.
Where it runs →See it run on your own code.
A working session rather than a slide deck. Bring a repository and a ticket you would otherwise assign to someone, and watch it go from the ticket to a pull request you approve.